Skip to main content

Aintree vs Scarsdale

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Scarsdale, VIC 3351

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Scarsdale wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeScarsdale
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$55K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%-
1-year house growth+1.1%+1.2%
3-year house growth-3.9%+4.3%
Vacancy rate14.5%10.0%
Population7,982855

Aintree vs Scarsdale: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $55K in Scarsdale, which makes Scarsdale the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.00% in Scarsdale, a gap of 0.98 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +1.2% in Scarsdale, so recent momentum favours Scarsdale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Scarsdale houses +4.3%, so Scarsdale has compounded faster than Aintree over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 10.0% in Scarsdale and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Scarsdale face less competition for tenants.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 855, roughly 9 times the size of Scarsdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Scarsdale for recent price momentum, Scarsdale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison