Aintree vs Southern Cross
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Southern Cross, VIC 3283
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Southern Cross wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Southern Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $295K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 2.11% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 3.39% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 5.7% |
| Population | 7,982 | 128 |
Aintree vs Southern Cross: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $295K in Southern Cross, which makes Southern Cross the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.11% in Southern Cross, a gap of 1.87 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 5.7% in Southern Cross and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Southern Cross face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 128, roughly 62 times the size of Southern Cross; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Southern Cross for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Southern Cross, VIC 3283
Open Southern Cross suburb profileRecent sales in Southern Cross
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison