Skip to main content

Aintree vs Strzelecki

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Strzelecki, VIC 3950

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Strzelecki wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeStrzelecki
Median house price$705K$705K
Median unit price$575K$255K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%4.25%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%-
1-year house growth+1.1%-
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%0.5%
Population7,982107

Aintree vs Strzelecki: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $705K in Aintree and $705K in Strzelecki.

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $255K in Strzelecki, which makes Strzelecki the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Strzelecki leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.25%, compared with 3.98% in Aintree, a gap of 0.27 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Strzelecki and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Strzelecki face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 107, roughly 75 times the size of Strzelecki; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Strzelecki for rental income, Strzelecki for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison