Aintree vs Tambo Upper
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Tambo Upper, VIC 3885
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Tambo Upper wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Tambo Upper |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $340K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 2.04% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 3.51% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 3.7% |
| Population | 7,982 | 325 |
Aintree vs Tambo Upper: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $340K in Tambo Upper, which makes Tambo Upper the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.04% in Tambo Upper, a gap of 1.94 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 3.7% in Tambo Upper and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Tambo Upper face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 325, roughly 25 times the size of Tambo Upper; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Tambo Upper for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison