Skip to main content

Aintree vs Tongala

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Tongala, VIC 3621

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Tongala wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeTongala
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$255K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%2.51%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%5.76%
1-year house growth+1.1%+11.8%estimate
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%0.3%
Population7,9821,973

Aintree vs Tongala: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $255K in Tongala, which makes Tongala the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.51% in Tongala, a gap of 1.47 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +11.8% in Tongala (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Tongala, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Tongala and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Tongala face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 1,973, roughly 4.0 times the size of Tongala; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Tongala for recent price momentum, Tongala for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Aintree vs Tongala: Property Investment Comparison (2026)