Aintree vs Toolern Vale
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Toolern Vale, VIC 3337
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Toolern Vale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Toolern Vale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $660K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 2.47% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 3.04% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 3.3% |
| Population | 7,982 | 818 |
Aintree vs Toolern Vale: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $660K in Toolern Vale, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Toolern Vale the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.47% in Toolern Vale, a gap of 1.51 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 3.3% in Toolern Vale and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Toolern Vale face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 818, roughly 10 times the size of Toolern Vale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Toolern Vale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison