Aintree vs Upper Gundowring
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Upper Gundowring, VIC 3691
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Upper Gundowring wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Upper Gundowring |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 3.16% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 6.0% |
| Population | 7,982 | 120 |
Aintree vs Upper Gundowring: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.16% in Upper Gundowring, a gap of 0.82 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 6.0% in Upper Gundowring and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Upper Gundowring face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 120, roughly 67 times the size of Upper Gundowring; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Upper Gundowring for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Upper Gundowring, VIC 3691
Open Upper Gundowring suburb profileRecent sales in Upper Gundowring
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison