Skip to main content

Aintree vs Violet Town

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Violet Town, VIC 3669

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Violet Town wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeViolet Town
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%6.03%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%3.56%
1-year house growth+1.1%+4.5%
3-year house growth-3.9%+24.8%
Vacancy rate14.5%1.0%
Population7,982936

Aintree vs Violet Town: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Violet Town leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.03%, compared with 3.98% in Aintree, a gap of 2.05 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +4.5% in Violet Town, so recent momentum favours Violet Town, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Violet Town houses +24.8%, so Violet Town has compounded faster than Aintree over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Violet Town and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Violet Town face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 936, roughly 9 times the size of Violet Town; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Violet Town for rental income, Violet Town for recent price momentum, Violet Town for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison