Aintree vs Warneet
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Warneet, VIC 3980
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Warneet wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Warneet |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $725K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 5.84% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 2.47% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 2.4% |
| Population | 7,982 | 565 |
Aintree vs Warneet: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $725K in Warneet, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Warneet the pricier one.
On cash flow, Warneet leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.84%, compared with 3.98% in Aintree, a gap of 1.86 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Warneet and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Warneet face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 565, roughly 14 times the size of Warneet; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Warneet for rental income, Warneet for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison