Skip to main content

Aintree vs Wellsford

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Wellsford, VIC 3551

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Wellsford wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeWellsford
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$440K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%5.07%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%6.22%
1-year house growth+1.1%+3.2%
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%1.8%
Population7,982144

Aintree vs Wellsford: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $440K in Wellsford, which makes Wellsford the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Wellsford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.07%, compared with 3.98% in Aintree, a gap of 1.09 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +3.2% in Wellsford, so recent momentum favours Wellsford, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Wellsford and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Wellsford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 144, roughly 55 times the size of Wellsford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wellsford for rental income, Wellsford for recent price momentum, Wellsford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison