Aintree vs Yallourn
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Yallourn, VIC 3825
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Yallourn wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Yallourn |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 4.20% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | +13.0% |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 2.9% |
| Population | 7,982 | 143 |
Aintree vs Yallourn: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Yallourn leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.98% in Aintree, a gap of 0.22 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +13.0% in Yallourn, so recent momentum favours Yallourn, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 2.9% in Yallourn and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Yallourn face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 143, roughly 56 times the size of Yallourn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Yallourn for rental income, Yallourn for recent price momentum, Yallourn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison