Skip to main content

Aintree vs Yinnar

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Yinnar, VIC 3869

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Yinnar wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeYinnar
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$355K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%5.18%
1-year house growth+1.1%+17.8%
3-year house growth-3.9%-15.4%
Vacancy rate14.5%1.2%
Population7,9821,021

Aintree vs Yinnar: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $355K in Yinnar, which makes Yinnar the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +17.8% in Yinnar, so recent momentum favours Yinnar, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Yinnar houses -15.4%, so Aintree has compounded faster than Yinnar over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Yinnar and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Yinnar face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 1,021, roughly 8 times the size of Yinnar; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Yinnar for recent price momentum, Yinnar for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison