Skip to main content

Albanvale vs Eynesbury

Property investment comparison - Albanvale, VIC 3021 vs Eynesbury, VIC 3338

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albanvale wins 5, Eynesbury wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbanvaleEynesbury
Median house price$690K$685K
Median unit price-$765K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%3.43%
Gross rental yield (units)5.00%3.16%
1-year house growth+10.4%-7.8%
3-year house growth+13.4%+2.3%
Vacancy rate0.6%6.8%
Population5,6412,838

Albanvale vs Eynesbury: what the numbers say

The median house price is $690K in Albanvale and $685K in Eynesbury, so Eynesbury is the cheaper entry point, with Albanvale houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Albanvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 3.43% in Eynesbury, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.4% in Albanvale and -7.8% in Eynesbury, so recent momentum favours Albanvale, while Eynesbury went backwards.

Looking back three years, Albanvale houses are +13.4% and Eynesbury houses +2.3%, so Albanvale has compounded faster than Eynesbury over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Albanvale and 6.8% in Eynesbury, so landlords in Albanvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albanvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,641 against 2,838, larger than Eynesbury; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Albanvale for rental income, Eynesbury for a lower purchase price, Albanvale for recent price momentum, Albanvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison