Skip to main content

Albany Creek vs Ball Bay

Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Ball Bay, QLD 4741

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 3, Ball Bay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbany CreekBall Bay
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price$935K$405K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.12%4.02%
Gross rental yield (units)3.90%2.79%
1-year house growth+14.9%estimate+14.5%
3-year house growth-+47.4%
Vacancy rate1.7%4.1%
Population16,385384

Albany Creek vs Ball Bay: what the numbers say

For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $935K against $405K in Ball Bay, which makes Ball Bay the more affordable unit market and Albany Creek the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ball Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.02%, compared with 3.12% in Albany Creek, a gap of 0.90 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Albany Creek (an estimate) and +14.5% in Ball Bay, so recent momentum favours Albany Creek, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Albany Creek and 4.1% in Ball Bay, so landlords in Albany Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 384, roughly 43 times the size of Ball Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ball Bay for rental income, Albany Creek for recent price momentum, Albany Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison