Skip to main content

Albany Creek vs Godwin Beach

Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Godwin Beach, QLD 4511

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 2, Godwin Beach wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbany CreekGodwin Beach
Median house price$1.3M-
Median unit price$920K$500K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%3.69%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%6.03%
1-year house growth+17.7%+6.7%estimate
3-year house growth+49.1%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.9%
Population16,385487

Albany Creek vs Godwin Beach: what the numbers say

For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $920K against $500K in Godwin Beach, which makes Godwin Beach the more affordable unit market and Albany Creek the pricier one.

On cash flow, Godwin Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.69%, compared with 3.13% in Albany Creek, a gap of 0.56 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.7% in Albany Creek and +6.7% in Godwin Beach (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Albany Creek, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Albany Creek and 1.9% in Godwin Beach, so landlords in Albany Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 487, roughly 34 times the size of Godwin Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Godwin Beach for rental income, Albany Creek for recent price momentum, Albany Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison