Albany Creek vs Hay Point
Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs Hay Point, QLD 4740
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 1, Hay Point wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Albany Creek | Hay Point |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | - |
| Median unit price | $935K | $250K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.12% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.90% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +14.9%estimate | +21.3%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 3.2% |
| Population | 16,385 | 1,306 |
Albany Creek vs Hay Point: what the numbers say
For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $935K against $250K in Hay Point, which makes Hay Point the more affordable unit market and Albany Creek the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Albany Creek (an estimate) and +21.3% in Hay Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Hay Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Albany Creek and 3.2% in Hay Point, so landlords in Albany Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 1,306, roughly 13 times the size of Hay Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hay Point for recent price momentum, Albany Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison