Albany Creek vs The Leap
Property investment comparison - Albany Creek, QLD 4035 vs The Leap, QLD 4740
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albany Creek wins 2, The Leap wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Albany Creek | The Leap |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | - |
| Median unit price | $935K | $1.5M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.12% | 3.49% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.90% | 1.89% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.9%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 1.1% |
| Population | 16,385 | 664 |
Albany Creek vs The Leap: what the numbers say
For units, Albany Creek sits at a median of $935K against $1.5M in The Leap, which makes Albany Creek the more affordable unit market and The Leap the pricier one.
On cash flow, The Leap leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.49%, compared with 3.12% in Albany Creek, a gap of 0.37 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in The Leap and 1.7% in Albany Creek, so landlords in The Leap face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Albany Creek is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,385 against 664, roughly 25 times the size of The Leap; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: The Leap for rental income, The Leap for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison