Skip to main content

Alberton vs Alderley

Property investment comparison - Alberton, QLD 4207 vs Alderley, QLD 4051

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alberton wins 2, Alderley wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbertonAlderley
Median house price-$1.7M
Median unit price$985K$855K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.59%2.46%
Gross rental yield (units)2.88%3.71%
1-year house growth+19.7%+12.7%
3-year house growth+38.5%+35.9%
Vacancy rate3.0%1.8%
Population5476,748

Alberton vs Alderley: what the numbers say

For units, Alberton sits at a median of $985K against $855K in Alderley, which makes Alderley the more affordable unit market and Alberton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Alderley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.46%, compared with 1.59% in Alberton, a gap of 0.87 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.7% in Alberton and +12.7% in Alderley, so recent momentum favours Alberton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alberton houses are +38.5% and Alderley houses +35.9%, so Alberton has compounded faster than Alderley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Alderley and 3.0% in Alberton, so landlords in Alderley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 547, roughly 12 times the size of Alberton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alderley for rental income, Alberton for recent price momentum, Alderley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison