Skip to main content

Albion Park vs Wadalba

Property investment comparison - Albion Park, NSW 2527 vs Wadalba, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albion Park wins 2, Wadalba wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbion ParkWadalba
Median house price$980K$980K
Median unit price$780K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)4.59%4.43%
1-year house growth+12.1%+7.0%
3-year house growth+11.3%+13.3%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.7%
Population13,8264,204

Albion Park vs Wadalba: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $980K in Albion Park and $980K in Wadalba.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.00% in Albion Park and 4.00% in Wadalba, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.1% in Albion Park and +7.0% in Wadalba, so recent momentum favours Albion Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Albion Park houses are +11.3% and Wadalba houses +13.3%, so Wadalba has compounded faster than Albion Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Wadalba and 0.8% in Albion Park, so landlords in Wadalba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Albion Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,826 against 4,204, roughly 3.3 times the size of Wadalba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Albion Park for recent price momentum, Wadalba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison