Skip to main content

Albion vs Alderley

Property investment comparison - Albion, QLD 4010 vs Alderley, QLD 4051

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albion wins 4, Alderley wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlbionAlderley
Median house price-$1.7M
Median unit price$840K$855K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.46%
Gross rental yield (units)4.28%3.71%
1-year house growth+14.1%+12.7%
3-year house growth+20.3%+35.9%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.8%
Population3,4466,748

Albion vs Alderley: what the numbers say

For units, Albion sits at a median of $840K against $855K in Alderley, which makes Albion the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Albion and +12.7% in Alderley, so recent momentum favours Albion, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Albion houses are +20.3% and Alderley houses +35.9%, so Alderley has compounded faster than Albion over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Albion and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Albion face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 3,446, larger than Albion; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Albion for recent price momentum, Albion for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison