Albion vs Cardross
Property investment comparison - Albion, VIC 3020 vs Cardross, VIC 3496
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albion wins 2, Cardross wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Albion | Cardross |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $800K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $530K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.44% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.97% | 2.92% |
| 1-year house growth | +4.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 2.3% |
| Population | 4,334 | 847 |
Albion vs Cardross: what the numbers say
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Albion and 2.3% in Cardross, so landlords in Albion face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Albion is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,334 against 847, roughly 5 times the size of Cardross; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Albion for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison