Albion vs Underbool
Property investment comparison - Albion, VIC 3020 vs Underbool, VIC 3509
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albion wins 1, Underbool wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Albion | Underbool |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $800K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $330K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.44% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.97% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +4.7%estimate | +20.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +40.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 7.6% |
| Population | 4,334 | 215 |
Albion vs Underbool: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +4.7% in Albion (an estimate) and +20.5% in Underbool, so recent momentum favours Underbool, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Albion and 7.6% in Underbool, so landlords in Albion face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Albion is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,334 against 215, roughly 20 times the size of Underbool; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Underbool for recent price momentum, Albion for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison