Albury vs Calga
Property investment comparison - Albury, NSW 2640 vs Calga, NSW 2250
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Albury wins 1, Calga wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Albury | Calga |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $950K | $950K |
| Median unit price | $545K | $605K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.09% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.29% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +15.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +18.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 0.6% |
| Population | 4,955 | 134 |
Albury vs Calga: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $950K in Albury and $950K in Calga.
For units, Albury sits at a median of $545K against $605K in Calga, which makes Albury the more affordable unit market and Calga the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Calga and 1.3% in Albury, so landlords in Calga face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Albury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,955 against 134, roughly 37 times the size of Calga; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Calga for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison