Alderley vs Alloway
Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Alloway, QLD 4670
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 2, Alloway wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alderley | Alloway |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.7M | - |
| Median unit price | $855K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.71% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +12.7% | +9.7% |
| 3-year house growth | +35.9% | +28.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.2% |
| Population | 6,748 | 488 |
Alderley vs Alloway: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +9.7% in Alloway, so recent momentum favours Alderley, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Alloway houses +28.1%, so Alderley has compounded faster than Alloway over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Alloway and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Alloway face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 488, roughly 14 times the size of Alloway; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Alderley for recent price momentum, Alloway for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison