Alderley vs Archerfield
Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Archerfield, QLD 4108
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 1, Archerfield wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alderley | Archerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.7M | - |
| Median unit price | $855K | $700K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | 3.70% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.71% | 2.58% |
| 1-year house growth | +12.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +35.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 0.1% |
| Population | 6,748 | 533 |
Alderley vs Archerfield: what the numbers say
For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $700K in Archerfield, which makes Archerfield the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.
On cash flow, Archerfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 2.46% in Alderley, a gap of 1.24 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Archerfield and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Archerfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 533, roughly 13 times the size of Archerfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Archerfield for rental income, Archerfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison