Skip to main content

Alderley vs Ascot

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Ascot, QLD 4007

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 3, Ascot wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyAscot
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$900K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%-
1-year house growth+12.7%+10.4%
3-year house growth+35.9%+11.3%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.3%
Population6,7486,531

Alderley vs Ascot: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $900K in Ascot, which makes Alderley the more affordable unit market and Ascot the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +10.4% in Ascot, so recent momentum favours Alderley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Ascot houses +11.3%, so Alderley has compounded faster than Ascot over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Ascot and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Ascot face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 6,531, larger than Ascot; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alderley for recent price momentum, Ascot for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison