Skip to main content

Alderley vs Clayfield

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Clayfield, QLD 4011

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 2, Clayfield wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyClayfield
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%3.80%
1-year house growth+12.7%+10.4%
3-year house growth+35.9%+25.0%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.4%
Population6,74810,897

Alderley vs Clayfield: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $820K in Clayfield, which makes Clayfield the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +10.4% in Clayfield, so recent momentum favours Alderley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Clayfield houses +25.0%, so Alderley has compounded faster than Clayfield over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Clayfield and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Clayfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Clayfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,897 against 6,748, larger than Alderley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alderley for recent price momentum, Clayfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison