Skip to main content

Alderley vs Coombabah

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Coombabah, QLD 4216

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 0, Coombabah wins 6. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyCoombabah
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%3.55%
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%4.76%
1-year house growth+12.7%+14.9%
3-year house growth+35.9%+47.2%
Vacancy rate1.8%0.4%
Population6,74810,298

Alderley vs Coombabah: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $820K in Coombabah, which makes Coombabah the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.

On cash flow, Coombabah leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.55%, compared with 2.46% in Alderley, a gap of 1.09 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +14.9% in Coombabah, so recent momentum favours Coombabah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Coombabah houses +47.2%, so Coombabah has compounded faster than Alderley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Coombabah and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Coombabah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Coombabah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,298 against 6,748, larger than Alderley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Coombabah for rental income, Coombabah for recent price momentum, Coombabah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison