Alderley vs Kobble Creek
Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Kobble Creek, QLD 4520
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 2, Kobble Creek wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alderley | Kobble Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.7M | - |
| Median unit price | $855K | $620K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | 2.12% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.71% | 5.30% |
| 1-year house growth | +12.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +35.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 7.8% |
| Population | 6,748 | 654 |
Alderley vs Kobble Creek: what the numbers say
For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $620K in Kobble Creek, which makes Kobble Creek the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.
On cash flow, Alderley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.46%, compared with 2.12% in Kobble Creek, a gap of 0.34 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Alderley and 7.8% in Kobble Creek, so landlords in Alderley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 654, roughly 10 times the size of Kobble Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Alderley for rental income, Alderley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison