Skip to main content

Alderley vs Mackay Harbour

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Mackay Harbour, QLD 4740

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 0, Mackay Harbour wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyMackay Harbour
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%5.02%
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%-
1-year house growth+12.7%-
3-year house growth+35.9%-
Vacancy rate1.8%0.7%
Population6,748686

Alderley vs Mackay Harbour: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $620K in Mackay Harbour, which makes Mackay Harbour the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mackay Harbour leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.02%, compared with 2.46% in Alderley, a gap of 2.56 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Mackay Harbour and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Mackay Harbour face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 686, roughly 10 times the size of Mackay Harbour; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mackay Harbour for rental income, Mackay Harbour for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison