Skip to main content

Alderley vs Mackay

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Mackay, QLD 4740

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 0, Mackay wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyMackay
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%4.49%
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%6.30%
1-year house growth+12.7%+17.0%
3-year house growth+35.9%+45.7%
Vacancy rate1.8%0.4%
Population6,7484,026

Alderley vs Mackay: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Mackay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.49%, compared with 2.46% in Alderley, a gap of 2.03 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +17.0% in Mackay, so recent momentum favours Mackay, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Mackay houses +45.7%, so Mackay has compounded faster than Alderley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Mackay and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Mackay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 4,026, larger than Mackay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mackay for rental income, Mackay for recent price momentum, Mackay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison