Alderley vs Milford
Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Milford, QLD 4310
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 1, Milford wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alderley | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.7M | - |
| Median unit price | $855K | $595K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.71% | 2.18% |
| 1-year house growth | +12.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +35.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.2% |
| Population | 6,748 | 190 |
Alderley vs Milford: what the numbers say
For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $595K in Milford, which makes Milford the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Milford and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Milford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 190, roughly 36 times the size of Milford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Milford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison