Skip to main content

Alderley vs Nerang

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Nerang, QLD 4211

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 0, Nerang wins 6. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyNerang
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$785K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%4.15%
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%4.80%
1-year house growth+12.7%+16.3%
3-year house growth+35.9%+47.9%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.0%
Population6,74817,048

Alderley vs Nerang: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $785K in Nerang, which makes Nerang the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.

On cash flow, Nerang leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.15%, compared with 2.46% in Alderley, a gap of 1.69 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +16.3% in Nerang, so recent momentum favours Nerang, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Nerang houses +47.9%, so Nerang has compounded faster than Alderley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Nerang and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Nerang face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Nerang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,048 against 6,748, roughly 2.5 times the size of Alderley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Nerang for rental income, Nerang for recent price momentum, Nerang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison