Skip to main content

Alderley vs Peregian Beach

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Peregian Beach, QLD 4573

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 2, Peregian Beach wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyPeregian Beach
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%3.02%
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%3.39%
1-year house growth+12.7%+13.8%
3-year house growth+35.9%+11.7%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.1%
Population6,7484,972

Alderley vs Peregian Beach: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Peregian Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.02%, compared with 2.46% in Alderley, a gap of 0.56 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +13.8% in Peregian Beach, so recent momentum favours Peregian Beach, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Peregian Beach houses +11.7%, so Alderley has compounded faster than Peregian Beach over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Peregian Beach and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Peregian Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 4,972, larger than Peregian Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Peregian Beach for rental income, Peregian Beach for recent price momentum, Peregian Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison