Skip to main content

Alderley vs Richlands

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Richlands, QLD 4077

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 0, Richlands wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyRichlands
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$785K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%3.51%
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%4.20%
1-year house growth+12.7%+20.5%estimate
3-year house growth+35.9%-
Vacancy rate1.8%1.3%
Population6,7485,621

Alderley vs Richlands: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $785K in Richlands, which makes Richlands the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.

On cash flow, Richlands leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.51%, compared with 2.46% in Alderley, a gap of 1.05 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +20.5% in Richlands (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Richlands, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Richlands and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Richlands face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 5,621, larger than Richlands; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Richlands for rental income, Richlands for recent price momentum, Richlands for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison