Skip to main content

Alderley vs Shorncliffe

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Shorncliffe, QLD 4017

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 3, Shorncliffe wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyShorncliffe
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$880K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%2.78%
1-year house growth+12.7%+14.0%
3-year house growth+35.9%+20.9%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.6%
Population6,7481,907

Alderley vs Shorncliffe: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $880K in Shorncliffe, which makes Alderley the more affordable unit market and Shorncliffe the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +14.0% in Shorncliffe, so recent momentum favours Shorncliffe, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Shorncliffe houses +20.9%, so Alderley has compounded faster than Shorncliffe over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Shorncliffe and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Shorncliffe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 1,907, roughly 3.5 times the size of Shorncliffe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Shorncliffe for recent price momentum, Shorncliffe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison