Skip to main content

Alderley vs Tanawha

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Tanawha, QLD 4556

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 3, Tanawha wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyTanawha
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$915K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%4.12%
1-year house growth+12.7%+8.9%
3-year house growth+35.9%+21.5%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.2%
Population6,7481,312

Alderley vs Tanawha: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $915K in Tanawha, which makes Alderley the more affordable unit market and Tanawha the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +8.9% in Tanawha, so recent momentum favours Alderley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Tanawha houses +21.5%, so Alderley has compounded faster than Tanawha over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Tanawha and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Tanawha face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 1,312, roughly 5 times the size of Tanawha; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alderley for recent price momentum, Tanawha for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison