Alderley vs Te Kowai
Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Te Kowai, QLD 4740
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 2, Te Kowai wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alderley | Te Kowai |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.7M | - |
| Median unit price | $855K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | 4.60% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.71% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +12.7% | +1.5% |
| 3-year house growth | +35.9% | +34.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Population | 6,748 | 227 |
Alderley vs Te Kowai: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Te Kowai leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.60%, compared with 2.46% in Alderley, a gap of 2.14 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +1.5% in Te Kowai, so recent momentum favours Alderley, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Te Kowai houses +34.1%, so Alderley has compounded faster than Te Kowai over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.8%.
Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 227, roughly 30 times the size of Te Kowai; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Te Kowai for rental income, Alderley for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison