Alderley vs Wellcamp
Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Wellcamp, QLD 4350
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 3, Wellcamp wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alderley | Wellcamp |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.7M | - |
| Median unit price | $855K | $1.2M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | 2.28% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.71% | 2.37% |
| 1-year house growth | +12.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +35.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 0.8% |
| Population | 6,748 | 346 |
Alderley vs Wellcamp: what the numbers say
For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $1.2M in Wellcamp, which makes Alderley the more affordable unit market and Wellcamp the pricier one.
On cash flow, Alderley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.46%, compared with 2.28% in Wellcamp, a gap of 0.18 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Wellcamp and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Wellcamp face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 346, roughly 20 times the size of Wellcamp; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Alderley for rental income, Wellcamp for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison