Skip to main content

Alderley vs Wooloowin

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Wooloowin, QLD 4030

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 3, Wooloowin wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyWooloowin
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$870K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%-
1-year house growth+12.7%+11.1%
3-year house growth+35.9%+31.6%
Vacancy rate1.8%0.9%
Population6,7484,029

Alderley vs Wooloowin: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $870K in Wooloowin, which makes Alderley the more affordable unit market and Wooloowin the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +11.1% in Wooloowin, so recent momentum favours Alderley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Wooloowin houses +31.6%, so Alderley has compounded faster than Wooloowin over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Wooloowin and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Wooloowin face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 4,029, larger than Wooloowin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alderley for recent price momentum, Wooloowin for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison