Skip to main content

Aldershot vs Hampden

Property investment comparison - Aldershot, QLD 4650 vs Hampden, QLD 4741

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldershot wins 3, Hampden wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAldershotHampden
Median house price$545K-
Median unit price$375K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.93%3.71%
Gross rental yield (units)5.63%-
1-year house growth+18.5%+12.4%
3-year house growth+56.0%+38.1%
Vacancy rate1.8%0.9%
Population1,311598

Aldershot vs Hampden: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Aldershot leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.93%, compared with 3.71% in Hampden, a gap of 1.22 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.5% in Aldershot and +12.4% in Hampden, so recent momentum favours Aldershot, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aldershot houses are +56.0% and Hampden houses +38.1%, so Aldershot has compounded faster than Hampden over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Hampden and 1.8% in Aldershot, so landlords in Hampden face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aldershot is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,311 against 598, roughly 2.2 times the size of Hampden; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aldershot for rental income, Aldershot for recent price momentum, Hampden for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison