Aldgate vs Hope Valley
Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs Hope Valley, SA 5090
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 2, Hope Valley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aldgate | Hope Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | - |
| Median unit price | $535K | $650K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.39% | 4.27% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.8%estimate | +11.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +37.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 0.9% |
| Population | 3,471 | 8,184 |
Aldgate vs Hope Valley: what the numbers say
For units, Aldgate sits at a median of $535K against $650K in Hope Valley, which makes Aldgate the more affordable unit market and Hope Valley the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Aldgate (an estimate) and +11.7% in Hope Valley, so recent momentum favours Hope Valley, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Hope Valley and 1.2% in Aldgate, so landlords in Hope Valley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Hope Valley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,184 against 3,471, roughly 2.4 times the size of Aldgate; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hope Valley for recent price momentum, Hope Valley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison