Aldgate vs Seaton
Property investment comparison - Aldgate, SA 5154 vs Seaton, SA 5023
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aldgate wins 1, Seaton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aldgate | Seaton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | - |
| Median unit price | $535K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | 3.17% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.39% | 4.15% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.8%estimate | +12.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +38.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 1.1% |
| Population | 3,471 | 10,877 |
Aldgate vs Seaton: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Seaton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.17%, compared with 2.46% in Aldgate, a gap of 0.71 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +6.8% in Aldgate (an estimate) and +12.2% in Seaton, so recent momentum favours Seaton, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Seaton and 1.2% in Aldgate, so landlords in Seaton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Seaton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,877 against 3,471, roughly 3.1 times the size of Aldgate; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Seaton for rental income, Seaton for recent price momentum, Seaton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison