Alexandra vs Cann River
Property investment comparison - Alexandra, VIC 3714 vs Cann River, VIC 3890
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alexandra wins 1, Cann River wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alexandra | Cann River |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $535K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $415K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.19% | 4.08% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.60% | 5.57% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +7.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | - |
| Population | 2,801 | 197 |
Alexandra vs Cann River: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Alexandra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.19%, compared with 4.08% in Cann River, a gap of 0.11 percentage points.
Alexandra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,801 against 197, roughly 14 times the size of Cann River; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Alexandra for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison