Skip to main content

Alfords Point vs Mascot

Property investment comparison - Alfords Point, NSW 2234 vs Mascot, NSW 2020

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfords Point wins 2, Mascot wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlfords PointMascot
Median house price$2.0M$2.0M
Median unit price$1.1M$900K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.95%
Gross rental yield (units)4.22%5.78%
1-year house growth+5.7%+5.0%
3-year house growth+17.1%+2.2%
Vacancy rate9.8%2.4%
Population3,13121,591

Alfords Point vs Mascot: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Alfords Point and $2.0M in Mascot, so Mascot is the cheaper entry point, with Alfords Point houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Alfords Point sits at a median of $1.1M against $900K in Mascot, which makes Mascot the more affordable unit market and Alfords Point the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.7% in Alfords Point and +5.0% in Mascot, so recent momentum favours Alfords Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alfords Point houses are +17.1% and Mascot houses +2.2%, so Alfords Point has compounded faster than Mascot over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Mascot and 9.8% in Alfords Point, so landlords in Mascot face less competition for tenants.

Mascot is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,591 against 3,131, roughly 7 times the size of Alfords Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mascot for a lower purchase price, Alfords Point for recent price momentum, Mascot for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison