Alfred Cove vs Belhus
Property investment comparison - Alfred Cove, WA 6154 vs Belhus, WA 6069
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfred Cove wins 0, Belhus wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alfred Cove | Belhus |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | - |
| Median unit price | $740K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.10% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.26% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +11.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +59.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 0.8% |
| Population | 2,830 | 264 |
Alfred Cove vs Belhus: what the numbers say
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Belhus and 1.1% in Alfred Cove, so landlords in Belhus face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Alfred Cove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,830 against 264, roughly 11 times the size of Belhus; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Belhus for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison