Skip to main content

Alfred Cove vs Shelley

Property investment comparison - Alfred Cove, WA 6154 vs Shelley, WA 6148

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfred Cove wins 3, Shelley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlfred CoveShelley
Median house price$1.6M-
Median unit price$740K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%2.80%
Gross rental yield (units)5.26%4.50%
1-year house growth+11.9%+20.1%
3-year house growth+59.5%+70.1%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.5%
Population2,8304,795

Alfred Cove vs Shelley: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Alfred Cove leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.80% in Shelley, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.9% in Alfred Cove and +20.1% in Shelley, so recent momentum favours Shelley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alfred Cove houses are +59.5% and Shelley houses +70.1%, so Shelley has compounded faster than Alfred Cove over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Alfred Cove and 1.5% in Shelley, so landlords in Alfred Cove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Shelley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,795 against 2,830, larger than Alfred Cove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alfred Cove for rental income, Shelley for recent price momentum, Alfred Cove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison