Skip to main content

Alfred Cove vs Viveash

Property investment comparison - Alfred Cove, WA 6154 vs Viveash, WA 6056

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfred Cove wins 1, Viveash wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlfred CoveViveash
Median house price$1.6M-
Median unit price$740K$655K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%4.50%
Gross rental yield (units)5.26%4.84%
1-year house growth+11.9%+18.4%estimate
3-year house growth+59.5%-
Vacancy rate1.1%0.5%
Population2,8301,280

Alfred Cove vs Viveash: what the numbers say

For units, Alfred Cove sits at a median of $740K against $655K in Viveash, which makes Viveash the more affordable unit market and Alfred Cove the pricier one.

On cash flow, Viveash leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 3.10% in Alfred Cove, a gap of 1.40 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.9% in Alfred Cove and +18.4% in Viveash (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Viveash, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Viveash and 1.1% in Alfred Cove, so landlords in Viveash face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alfred Cove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,830 against 1,280, roughly 2.2 times the size of Viveash; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Viveash for rental income, Viveash for recent price momentum, Viveash for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison