Alfredton vs Culgoa
Property investment comparison - Alfredton, VIC 3350 vs Culgoa, VIC 3530
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfredton wins 1, Culgoa wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alfredton | Culgoa |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $670K | - |
| Median unit price | $420K | $460K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.75% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.74% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +11.1%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | - |
| Population | 11,822 | 86 |
Alfredton vs Culgoa: what the numbers say
For units, Alfredton sits at a median of $420K against $460K in Culgoa, which makes Alfredton the more affordable unit market and Culgoa the pricier one.
Alfredton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,822 against 86, roughly 137 times the size of Culgoa; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison