Alfredton vs Lalbert
Property investment comparison - Alfredton, VIC 3350 vs Lalbert, VIC 3542
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alfredton wins 0, Lalbert wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alfredton | Lalbert |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $670K | - |
| Median unit price | $420K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.75% | 8.31% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.74% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +11.1%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | - |
| Population | 11,822 | 138 |
Alfredton vs Lalbert: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Lalbert leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 8.31%, compared with 3.75% in Alfredton, a gap of 4.56 percentage points.
Alfredton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,822 against 138, roughly 86 times the size of Lalbert; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lalbert for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison